Climate risk · Panel econometrics
Climate Risk & Conservation Adoption
Analyzing the relationship between extreme weather and established cover-crop share across nine U.S. states.
- Focus
- Cover-crop useWeather exposure and establishment
- Region
- Midwest & Great PlainsNine U.S. states
- Study period
- 2005–201814 years of annual observations
- Analytical sample
- 440 counties6,160 county-year observations
The problem
Conservation programs depend on sustained cover-crop use. Severe drought and unusually wet weather can change both producers’ reasons to plant and the conditions needed for cover crops to establish.
The study examines whether the severity and timing of weather exposure are associated with the share of cropland where cover crops become established.
Cover-crop adoption
County patterns, 2005 and 2018.
Key results
Each additional month of exceptional drought in the preceding growing season was associated with a 1.88-percentage-point decrease in established cover-crop share. Extreme and exceptional wetness were associated with increases of 0.47 and 0.54 percentage points per additional month, respectively.
Baseline estimates, Table 2, Model I; April–September exposure in the preceding year.
Analytical approach
Data preparation
I combined OpTIS satellite-based cover-crop shares with NOAA/NIDIS moisture indicators and NOAA nClimGrid-Daily weather records in a balanced county-year panel.
Econometric estimation
I estimated correlated random-effects fractional-logit models with county means, year effects, weather controls, and standard errors clustered by county.
Timing and robustness
I compared growing-season and establishment exposure and tested alternative weather specifications, lagged exposure, and sensitivity to the 2012 weather year.
Weather exposure across counties and seasons
Practical relevance
The findings can inform conservation-program timing and technical assistance by identifying weather conditions associated with lower cover-crop establishment.
Interpreting the results
Satellite measures capture established cover crops, so planting intentions cannot be separated from establishment success. The estimates describe county-level associations within the study sample, not causal effects on individual producer decisions.